Skip to main content
Closed for Voting

Don't require SLA

Related products:Freshdesk
  • August 28, 2012
  • 12 replies
  • 51 views

I understand that SLA is useful for many scenarios, but I don't find it useful for mine. The relationships we have with our customers are long running, and to force use to use a SLA whose max time is 1 month leads to a lot of tickets being "overdue" when in fact they are not by our standards. I'd love SLA to be optional.

12 replies

  • Community Debut
  • August 30, 2012
Is it possible to add
- a choise "No limit" ?
- a customized limit ?

Same here! Not all our clients/products need a strict SLA.

Next to the no SLA option, it would be nice to disable the SLA on ticket type. For example: for bugs I need a SLA, but for change requests or questions I don't.

  • Community Debut
  • October 22, 2012
We are a small business and find this feature a nuciance at present, we may use it in future when we have more reps and require more control but would be preferable if there was a disable option at present.

  • Contributor
  • December 2, 2012
I like this idea.  I do like the having an SLA for our customers but it would be nice to be able to assign project work to a group that doesn't have the SLA attached.

  • Contributor
  • January 18, 2013

We would like to setup a custom priority where we could have no SLA say for a project and then assign our own due date.


  • Contributor
  • January 20, 2013

In response to Chris's original post. Whilst they may not be optional this should work for you:


1) Create some new "relevant" Status's with your own labels and set the SLA to OFF (see screenshot with examples for "Waiting on vendor" and "Project" - but these could be called anything)

2) Set-up Dispatch'r or Scenario Automations to set the status of incoming tickets to one of your customised Status or to change the status of existing tickets as you work on them - therefore always keeping them in a status type where the SLA is off.


By doing this you always have tickets categorised with a "Status" where the SLA is not in play. Not exactly what you want but a work around until you have the option perhaps?


We've added "Waiting on Vendor" and "Project" as additional status types that SLA's do not come into play with. We take the view that if it is stuck with a vendor we do want to take the SLA hit and / or if it is big enough for it to be part of a project then it will take too long to be worrying about an SLA.


Hope this helps.

sla_11375.jpg

  • Author
  • Contributor
  • January 20, 2013

Thanks Gareth! That's closer to what I was looking for. The only downside is that the default statuses have to remain and are liable to be confused with the new, overriding statues. A simple solution would be to just make the SLA timer switch available for the default statuses. 


annapoorna.venketaraman
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+8

Hey!


Really sorry for replying insanely late on this thread! 


I am sorry but I really don't think we can come up with an 'optional' SLA policy as of now. But what we are thinking of is, increasing the max SLA time to 6 months or a year maybe. This way I guess you wouldn't have to worry about SLA violations. Rather, it is almost as if there is no SLA clock running. 


Let me know if this sounds like a good idea. Else, we can think of something better. Feel free to drop in more ideas here!


Thanks,

Annapoorna 


  • Author
  • Contributor
  • February 13, 2013

@Annapoorna V, that would work. I'd go high like 1 year. A better solution in my opinion, however, would be to make the SLA 'OFF' switch available for the default statuses (i.e. allow us to turn SLA off for 'Open' status and the like just like I can with custom statuses).


I ended up not sticking with the custom statuses because it got confusing when customers would re-open their tickets. A re-open puts the ticket in status 'Open', which I was "overriding" with my own custom status, and since my custom views were setup with the custom statuses it became confusing to track where all tickets were.


  • Contributor
  • March 20, 2018

One SLA for all tickets does not seem very useful at all. We have different SLA's for different levels of support and it would be nice to be able to base the SLA on a custom field.


  • Contributor
  • April 24, 2018

This is such a strange thing to require. It's not how we work with our constituents. I realize I can set it to like 11 months but it's still strange to have on the ticket. 


  • Apprentice
  • January 10, 2020

I would like to revisit this thread and the SLA policy, which does not make sense for our use case. Our customers add a custom delivery date for when they need materials delivered. The SLA dates confuse our agents and interfere with accurate reporting on delivery. Please advise if there is a way to turn this feature off.