Fresh Desk’s implementation of priorities uses the following values:
Low > Medium > High > Urgent.
With reference to ITIL (and most other Service Management Frameworks), Priority is normally derived as a function of IMPACT x URGENCY - i.e. What is the overall impact to the business and are there circumstances present that increase the need to resolve in a certain timeframe.
By having URGENT as one of the Priority Values, Fresh Desk is mixing up terminology and introducing a degree of ambiguity. URGENT is one the parameters feeding into Prioritisation, it is not a Priority Value.
Creating a custom field is a poor work around given the role of Priority within the tool.
Adopting a more traditional P1 - P4 model would be the best way to address this.
New Idea
Priority Field needs to be fixed
Join the Community
Already have an account? Login
Welcome back to Freshworks Community
No account yet? Create an account
Social Login
Login for Freshworks Employees Login with LinkedInor sign up below
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.

