Skip to main content
Open : Open for Consideration

Workflow Automator

Related products:Freshservice
  • November 2, 2022
  • 28 replies
  • 1169 views

KrisC
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

Hello FS devs,

 

Another idea with the workflow automator. It would be nice on conditional nodes to be able to move the next action connection. Lets say I have a very detailed automation, with main steps and sub steps following. I need each main step to complete regardless of a previous substep failing. 

 

An Example: Creating a user account in Google, I have the workflow check to see if there is already an account, if so the workflow stops. If not then proceed with creating the account. Right now I have to split the workflow among different workflows because of this. Basically I would like to see the ability to route the conditional yes/no to a later step (bypassing some if they are not needed) Here is a picture of an example:
 

 

I can do this now but I have to repeat nodes over and over to achieve this making the automation very cluttered and redundant. 

28 replies

afautley
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • November 3, 2022

Can i echo this, we have very complex workflows that do not need to be that complex all because we cannot choose where the flow will go next. 

We have to duplicate steps over and over, in some cases we have multiple triggers that split the flow and have 12 duplicate automations for the same action!


PatrickMurphy
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Skilled Expert
  • November 7, 2022

I as well have to create more complex workflows than need to skirt around some of this as well. For instance getting manager approval. If the manager puts the ticket in and I want to skip their approval BUT I have other processes like a business approver or automation tasks, you have to build two separate workflows.

If the requestor is the CEO and doesn’t have a manager, I also have to create different workflows for the same process but skip for this exception. 

Being able to jump to another spot in the workflow would avoid a lot of rework and complex processing with separately defined workflows.


msconfig87
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • November 7, 2022

nice! I wanted to create the exact same feature request as you did. +1


rmcar_ams
Apprentice
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Apprentice
  • November 24, 2022

Plus one for this, it overcomplicates worklfows that involve mutliple duplicates simply because you cannot skip to a step. Please implement this, it would be a huge deal for the workflow automator.


afautley
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • November 24, 2022

@Prashanth and @Shashang and @rashmi.nag @Jack Day 

This is what i was discussing with you on our Call the other day. Please can you drum up some support for this. 


  • Community Debut
  • November 25, 2022

Hi @KrisC @afautley and all

Thanks for bringing this up, this is a very valid ask. We understand how this could make it easier to setup complex workflows. I will highlight this to our product manager for orchestration and see if we can prioritize this in our roadmap. We will keep you posted.

Meanwhile, please continue to voice out your asks, this will really help us enhance our product.

Thank you 


ammon.nelson
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Skilled Expert
  • March 2, 2023

I like this idea. I think if you made the condition nodes like a closed group. You say what happens if true, what happens if false, then what happens after that condition is complete. You can make either the true or false include an escape action so that the workflow doesn’t continue if selected.


Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • March 30, 2023

Yes! this would be awesome. The ability to drag and drop all nodes in a workflow would be amazing.


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Contributor
  • August 30, 2023

Please let me know when this has been implemented. I completely agree this is needed. 


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Apprentice
  • September 5, 2023

Our organization would also like to see this feature implemented. It would make our workflows more simple and easier to keep up with. 


Alefre
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Skilled Expert
  • September 8, 2023

This is a really useful feature, highly requested by my team and others! @Prashanth - any updates since your last post? 

/Alex


alyssia.correa
Skilled Expert
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
New IdeaOpen : Open for Consideration

Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Skilled Expert
  • April 10, 2024

This would be amazing! and reduce so much duplication of workflows


Medic1334
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • April 11, 2024

Another tool that we use for automation on other processes uses GoJS which is quite robust it appears. You can see tons of info here: https://gojs.net/latest/samples/index.html.  Given that FS uses Javascript already heavily hopefully this would be a decent add.

 

NodeRED is also built around this and is FOSS. Their repo is here: https://github.com/node-red/node-red while not intended to be used for ITSM work, it drives smart home automation and I’m guessing code from here could be used as a baseline in addition to that above to compile a much more robust GUI based scripting environment.

 


Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Active Contributor
  • September 2, 2024

simply being able to drag and drop elements within a workflow would be a massive improvement!

 

Also, the loopback to review other conditions would be invaluable...


Forum|alt.badge.img+5

This would save so much node creation in the workflows. This is a function that is not at all uncommon in other ITSM vendors automation engines, much needed feature to allow more generic and maintainable workflows overall, +1


  • February 13, 2025

Is there any update on this? I am needing to build out some very complicated workflows and this feature would make it so much easier.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Apprentice
  • February 13, 2025

Agreed. This would be very helpful, along with the typical ForEach / DoUntil looping. Hoping for an update soon


mbutler
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • February 13, 2025

@Jake Henegar & ​@kinda179 - I have an open request for loops - no luck yet.

 


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Contributor
  • February 13, 2025

Personnaly i gave up on Fresh automator xD 

I use Fresh automator only to call a logic app (with better conditional, loops, etc...) then Fresh automator add a not with the response of the logic app, and close the ticket if statut code is 200


mbutler
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • February 13, 2025

Personnaly i gave up on Fresh automator xD 

I use Fresh automator only to call a logic app (with better conditional, loops, etc...) then Fresh automator add a not with the response of the logic app, and close the ticket if statut code is 200

Which app are you using? I am in the process of procuring Power Automate Pro to do some things that can’t be done with the automator.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Contributor
  • February 13, 2025

Personnaly i gave up on Fresh automator xD 

I use Fresh automator only to call a logic app (with better conditional, loops, etc...) then Fresh automator add a not with the response of the logic app, and close the ticket if statut code is 200

Which app are you using? I am in the process of procuring Power Automate Pro to do some things that can’t be done with the automator.

Azure logic app, it’s the Azure “equivalent” of Office power automate flow. I think both will work fine :)


Daniel Söderlund
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+14

@Jake Henegar & ​@kinda179 - I have an open request for loops - no luck yet.

 

It’s on the roadmap just pushed ahead 


Karel_Vlček
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Top Contributor ⭐
  • February 20, 2025

Great! Is there any date on the roadmap for this? I will look myself, but the roadmap is really hard to access for me - top secret :D


Daniel Söderlund
Top Contributor ⭐
Forum|alt.badge.img+14

Great! Is there any date on the roadmap for this? I will look myself, but the roadmap is really hard to access for me - top secret :D

Keep an eye out for the roadmap webinar they have each months, last I heard looping/sub flows should release  Q3 - Q4 but it can change.